click to dismiss

Please change your bookmark for this page

Compare between RSM and Sonar

Rajesh Kumar

Profile

Friends

Friends of

Blog

Files

Pages

Rajesh Kumar

April 16, 2010 by Rajesh Kumar   Comments (0)

, ,

software configuration management, testing tools, test coverage tools, source-code analysis, automation practice

Metrics Tools
Category Metric Comment RSM Sonar
Function Metrics LOC Lines of Code Per Function, All Functions Yes Yes
  eLOC (Effective LOC) Per Function, All Functions Yes Yes
  lLOC (Logical Statements LOC) Per Function, All Functions Yes No
  FP Function Points Derived from LOC metrics Per Function, All Functions Yes No
  Comments Lines Per Function, All Functions Yes Yes
  Blank Lines Per Function, All Functions Yes Yes
  Physical Lines Per Function, All Functions Yes Yes
  Number of Input Parameters Per Function,  Yes No
  Number of Return Points Per Function,  Yes No
  Interface Complexity (Parameters + Returns) Per Function,  Yes Yes
  Cyclomatic Complexity Logical Branching Per Function, All Functions Yes No
  Functional Complexity (Interface + Cyclomatic) Per Function, All Functions Yes No
  Functional Quality Analysis Per Function,  Yes Yes
  Number of functions Total, Average, Maximum and Minimums All Functions Yes Yes
  Logical Lines All Functions Yes No
  Return Points All Functions Yes No
  Function Parameters All Functions Yes No
  Total Quality Profile All Functions Yes ?
Class Metrics Number of public, private, protected data attributes Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes
  Number of public, private, protected methods Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes
  Template Type Per Class,  Yes No
  Inheritance Per Class,  Yes No
  Depth of Inheritance Tree Per Class,  Yes Yes
  Number of derived child classes per base class Per Class,  Yes Yes
  LOC Lines of Code Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes
  eLOC (Effective LOC) Per Class, All Classes Yes No
  lLOC (Logical Statements LOC) Per Class, All Classes Yes No
  Comments Lines Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes
  Blank Lines Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes
  Physical Lines Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes
  Number of Input Parameters Per Class, All Classes Yes No
  Number of Return Points Per Class, All Classes Yes No
  Interface Complexity (Parameters + Returns) Per Class, All Classes Yes No
  Cyclomatic Complexity Logical Branching Per Class, All Classes Yes No
  Class Complexity (Interface + Cyclomatic) Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes
  Class Quality Analysis RSM Quality Analysis Per Class,  Yes No
  Total number of classes All Classes Yes Yes
  Inheritance Tree All Classes Yes No
  Number of Base Classes All Classes Yes Yes
  Number of Derived Classes All Classes Yes Yes
  Derived/Base Class Ratio All Classes Yes No
  Maximum and Average Inheritance Depth All Classes Yes No
  Maximum and Average Number of Child Classes All Classes Yes No
  Total Quality Profile All Classes Yes ?
Namespace or Package Metrics Number of classes Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes
  Number of functions Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes
  Average functions per class Per Namespace,  Yes Yes
  Number of public, private, protected data attributes Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes
  Number of public, private, protected methods Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes
  LOC Lines of Code Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes
  eLOC (Effective LOC) Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No
  lLOC (Logical Statements LOC) Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No
  Comments Lines Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes
  Blank Lines Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes
  Physical Lines Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes
  Number of Input Parameters Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No
  Number of Return Points Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No
  Interface Complexity (Parameters + Returns) Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No
  Cyclomatic Complexity Logical Branching Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No
  Package/Namespace Complexity (Interface + Cyclomatic) Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No
  Quality Analysis RSM Quality Analysis Per Namespace,  Yes No
  Total Quality Profile All Namespace/Packages Yes ?
File Metrics LOC Lines of Code   Yes Yes
  eLOC (Effective LOC)   Yes No
  lLOC (Logical Statements LOC)   Yes No
  FP Function Points Derived from LOC   Yes No
  Comments Lines   Yes Yes
  Blank Lines   Yes Yes
  Logical and Physical Lines   Yes Yes
  Comment and White space percentages   Yes Yes
  Average Character line length   Yes No
  Memory Allocation and De-allocation metric   Yes No
  Language Keyword use   Yes No
  Language Construct use   Yes No
  Extract Comments per file for understandability rating and spell checking   Yes No
  Extract Strings per file for spell checking   Yes No
  Create files in line numbered format for code reviews   Yes No
  Number of Quality Notices per file   Yes No
  Metrics differentials between two file version   Yes No
Project Metrics Total LOC, eLOC, lLOC, Comment, Blanks, Lines   Yes Yes
  FP Function Points Derived from LOC metrics   Yes No
  Total Function Metrics   Yes No
  Total Class Metrics   Yes Yes
  Total Namespace Metrics   Yes No
  Inheritance Tree and Metrics   Yes No
  Language Keywords, constructs and metrics   Yes No
  Quality Profile   Yes ?
  Metric Estimation Factors for software estimates   Yes No
  Total Language Metrics Example   Yes No
  Total C, C++ and Header Files   Yes No
  Total Java Files   Yes No
  Total Number of Files   Yes Yes
Baseline Metric Differential      Yes Yes